AI art
19

SeeDream Test: Hannah

Wanted to test SeeDream a bit. So image 1 is the baseline and everything after is the various changes using SeeDream. Any attempt to do something explicit like fingering herself or mention the word pussy and goes into body morphing territory (Which I promptly deleted. One of them almost made me gag). So I'm starting to see its limits.

Generation data

Prompt
1girl, plump female, love handles, white shirt, pink sweater, white jeans, black belt, round-shaped western buckle, arms behind back, untucked sweater, leaning back, leaning on wall, close-up crotch
Negative Prompt
missing fingers, belly button visible, deformed eyes, looking at viewer, torn jeans, tight jeans, thigh boots, collated shirt, blouse, cowboy shot
Seed 66003613228 stepsCFG Scale 5Euler a
Seed
660036132
Steps
28
CFG Scale
5
Sampler
Euler a

More by doggomage

Amanda: Self Love
Amanda and the View
Meet New OC Amanda (SFW Monday)
Hannah’s Peach 🍑
Hannah’s Peachy Butt (Repost)
Monsterification Contest - Miki and Curiosity

Comments (19)

S
Even without the title I'll recognize that face by those pants
L
Thank you for sharing, its why i posted my seadream test yesterday on attempting to recreate pussy without seadream messing it up. Im trying to figure it out. This just confirms what some of us have been suspecting that seadream limits is sexual activity, actions and genitals. Even providing something simpler like a penis it deforms it around the head, seen it often early on using seadream a few weeks ago when trying to post some of my sexual content. its why you don't see me having sex in my post because its so frustrating when i comes to that. it can't comprehend a sexual action and forget pussy anatomy.
S
interesting experiment🤔👍
R
Damn, Seedream sure is quick to show it all off... 😏🔥
K
Good to know nice testing 😎
P
😏👍
S
It's interesting to see what Seedream can do (and what it won't do)...
C
It is necessary testing models and settings... Otherwise results are based on luck...
P
I guess they will update how it works in the future? It looks ok visually/artistically besides the mistakes

Similar posts